What Exactly Does an Editor Do
Monday, January 11, 2010 Question of the day: How do you deal with editors? How much can an editor actually do to, and for, your work?
This answer is going to vary from writer to writer and from publishing house to publishing house. Some authors will tell you that these days, editors - to no fault of their own - are overworked and don't have a ton of time to actually edit. That agents are increasingly handling the bulk of that load: that agents will work with clients to really polish a manuscript before it goes out such that it doesn't need a heavy hand once it's been sold.
That said, I've been truly fortunate in that my editors at Shaye Areheart/Crown have been just the opposite. They dive in and have really helped me shape my books. I work with my editors in the way that some writers probably use critique groups, albeit with larger portions of a book. With The One That I Want, I really struggled to pinpoint what wasn't working with the manuscript, so my editor read the first hundred pages and offered some suggestions. When she does this, she isn't saying, "Make your characters do this," or "Cut this," she just more suggests some themes to play with, some general ideas to get the juices flowing. For example, Tilly, my protagonist, is given the gift of foresight into the future, she originally was given this gift by your stereotypical fortune teller. It didn't ring true, and I knew this and I raised it with my editor, who said, "Hey, this is a book about your past and your future, why not consider having the person who tells her this prophesy be a person whom she already knows?" GENIUS! I took that suggestion and ran with it...and that new character became a major - and pivotal - character in the rest of the book.
The same is true once the overall manuscript was complete. Again, I knew it wasn't where I wanted it to be, so my editor - who smartly didn't want to read much more again after the 100 pages so she could see the completed work with fresh eyes - gave me broad brushstrokes: why don't you try this, or how about drawing this out more, and then letting me figure out just HOW I was going to do that. Which I really appreciated. I've said this before, but I know myself as a writer: I can take something to a certain level and then I need an objective resource to help steer me to the next level. My editor does this by letting me retain total control and freedom over my writing and characters and imagination AND while still fine-tuning the ms.
So that's my experience. I know this doesn't hold true for everyone, but in the best of all worlds, I imagine this is what editor-author relationships to be. Anyone else want to weigh in?



